Imaging Meets the Forensic Files
How postmortem CT is transforming forensic and clinical death investigations
Postmortem imaging is revolutionizing death investigation and research, with postmortem CT (PMCT) now regularly used to investigate deaths in both the forensic and clinical settings.
“PMCT is a force multiplier, enabling rapid triage of cases, unbiased and unaltered documentation, and a permanent archive,” said Jamie Elifritz, MD, a diagnostic radiologist who serves as chief medical officer for the Forensic Radiology Group. “It increases throughput and lowers the threshold to investigate by making the process faster and less invasive.”
In forensics, PMCT is useful for detecting and localizing subtle fractures, air and fluid collections, and foreign bodies such as bullet fragments, providing a 3D ‘roadmap’ for the forensic pathologist. On the clinical side of the equation, it allows doctors to compare clinical diagnoses made during life with the actual findings at death.
PMCT can also check the position and integrity of devices inside the body after death, helping investigators confirm whether device placement contributed to a complication or death.
“In short, PMCT provides a way to ‘audit’ the accuracy of diagnoses and treatments after death,” explained Kalpana Kanal, PhD, chief of diagnostic physics at the University of Washington (UW) in Seattle.
Imaging Before Incision
PMCT can also complement full autopsy. “Because PMCT provides a full-body, permanent, and shareable record before any incision is made, it can help pathologists make informed decisions about which cases require full autopsy,” said J. Matthew Lacy, MD, chief medical examiner at the King County Medical Examiner Office in Seattle.
“PMCT can help increase the quality of death investigations by offering a non-invasive, faster, and more acceptable alternative to traditional autopsy,” added David Zamora, MS, a medical physicist at UW.
When full autopsy is indicated, PMCT findings can be used to guide dissection and document evidence. “PMCT can inform a more targeted dissection, which saves time and, in certain cases such as trauma, mass disasters or when families object to autopsy, can serve as a partial or alternative approach to traditional autopsy,” Dr. Kanal noted.
How Imaging Adds Value to Standard Autopsy
Despite its many strengths, PMCT does have limitations. For instance, due to postmortem changes in tissue and the inability to routinely give intravenous contrast, it can miss soft tissue pathology.
As a result, conventional autopsy remains the gold standard. “While PMCT is unlikely to entirely replace autopsy, integrating it into a collaborative program between the medical examiner’s office and radiology adds substantial value to forensic and medicolegal death investigations,” said Jonathan Medverd, MD, chief of radiology at the UW Harborview Medical Center.
To illustrate, Dr. Medverd noted how, in homicide cases, PMCT can reveal additional details or offer different perspectives than the standard autopsy. These details can be invaluable in explaining injuries to juries with little medical background, and they can make the evidence less emotionally upsetting.
“For hospital deaths, presenting antemortem CT scans can be more informative than autopsy when therapeutic interventions have altered disease appearance,” Dr. Medverd explained. “In addition, 3D PMCT renderings may address concerns that autopsy photographs are overly prejudicial, enhancing their probative value in judicial proceedings.”
Examination of a charred body represents a particular forensic challenge, for which imaging can be helpful in documenting injuries caused by burns, as well as those related to cause of death. (A) Photograph shows a charred body. (B) 3D volume-rendered image shows the decedent with original positioning otherwise undisturbed. (C, D) Coronal (C) and sagittal (D) PMCT images show a heat epidural (arrowheads).
https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.240192 ©RSNA 2025
PMCT Interpretation Requires a Special Skill Set
Because PMCT is used to determine cause of death or injury patterns and is often done in correlation with autopsy, PMCT interpretation differs from clinical imaging. As such, PMCT requires certain skills beyond standard radiology, including the ability to recognize postmortem artifacts, interpret trauma and foreign bodies in a forensic context, and correlate findings with death scene investigation findings, autopsy or toxicology.
According to Nadia Solomon, MD, MSc, MA, a clinical fellow at Yale University School of Medicine, there are many pitfalls that a radiologist unfamiliar with PMCT interpretation could easily fall into, such as mistaking postmortem change for pathology related to cause of death. “Clinical radiologists without experience or training should not assume their skills and knowledge will be immediately applicable,” she said. “If they do mistake a finding, their interpretations may be inaccurate.”
“Radiologists interpreting postmortem imaging must also be able to collaborate with forensic pathologists, understand the jurisdiction where they are practicing, and have a firm appreciation for medico-legal reporting in medicolegal investigations,” Dr. Elifritz added.
3D volume-rendered PMCTA images of an ex vivo heart, retrieved during autopsy in a 68-year-old man, show proximal coronary artery calcifications (arrowheads) and progressive opacification of the coronary arteries following contrast material injections.
https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.240192 ©RSNA 2025
Another key skill is the ability to recognize the special context in which PM imaging is performed.
“In clinical radiology, studies are planned and targeted precisely, but in the postmortem setting, workflows may demand broader, one-size-fits all approaches to imaging,” Dr. Kanal said. “This means the radiologist may need to take a different approach to reading in order to be efficient and responsive to the needs of the forensic service.”
Radiologists can acquire these skills through formal forensic radiology courses or textbooks, hands-on experience with medical examiners, mentorship from experienced forensic radiologists, and by reviewing PMCT case studies. The International Society of Forensic Radiology and Imaging, a global consortium of forensic imaging experts, is also an excellent source of information.
“Having a properly trained radiologist interpreting PMCT is essential because their imaging interpretation expertise can increase confidence in distinguishing true pathology from postmortem artifacts, identify subtle injuries or disease, and contribute to legally credible reports,” Dr. Kanal said.
Radiology a Key Component in the Forensic Workflow
More than just interpreting images, radiologists must also integrate into the forensic workflow. That means participating in daily huddles and case conference discussions, having access to images and clinical context, and including radiologist findings in the official medical examiner report.
“Radiologists can bring value-added expertise to the forensic team, but this requires thinking creatively, both by individuals and by those institutions interested in exploring this new and growing radiology subspecialty,” Dr. Kanal concluded.
For More Information
Access the RadioGraphics article, “Postmortem CT: Applications in Clinical and Forensic Medicine.”
Access the PubMed article, “Early Experience with Postmortem CT Imaging.”
Read previous RSNA News stories on CT imaging:
- Spotting Critical Cardiac Clues on Emergency Chest CT
- Photon-Counting CT: A Game Changer in MSK Imaging?