21/xsl/MobileMenu.xsltmobileNave880e1541/WorkArea//https://www.rsna.org/TwoColumnWireframe.aspx?pageid=2794&id=7634&ekfxmen_noscript=1&ekfxmensel=falsefalsetruetruetruefalsefalse10-18.0.0.0730truefalse
  •  
     
  • News App
  • To:
    From:
    Subject:
    Comment:
    Link:
      
  • Radiology Compensation Rates Drop Slightly in 2011

    December 01, 2012

    After experiencing modest compensation increases for two consecutive years, radiologists saw their incomes dip slightly in 2011.

    OF THE 30 specialties surveyed for the 2012 American Medical Group Association (AMGA) 25th Annual Medical Group Compensation and Financial Survey, nearly 3 in 4 saw increases in compensation, averaging 2.8 percent above the previous year. But while radiologists remain some of the best compensated specialists, diagnostic and interventional radiology were among the five specialties that experienced a slight decrease in compensation from 2010 to 2011.

    AMGA mailed the survey questionnaire to medical groups across the country in January 2012 and received responses from 225 groups representing more than 55,000 providers.

    The survey showed that the median compensation level for interventional radiologists was $485,277, a 1.39 percent decrease from 2010 to 2011, while median compensation for diagnostic radiologists fell by 0.45 percent to $459,186. In terms of compensation, radiologists ranked fourth and fifth respectively among specialties surveyed.

    Among other factors, experts say radiology may have reached a cooling off point after years of being considered a “hot” specialty.

    “Whenever you see a big increase in a hot specialty like radiology, you will eventually hit periods that are a bit flatter,” said Brad Vaudrey, M.B.A., C.P.A., principal at Sullivan, Cotter & Associates, Inc., which administered the AMGA survey. “Now, a plateau is occurring.”

    A number of factors are affecting the lower than average increases or “leveling out” of compensation in radiology, according to Donald W. Fisher, Ph.D., CAE, president and chief executive officer of AMGA. “Some of the primary drivers are shifts in the reimbursement levels from payers, new payment models that focus on value-based care (population health) rather than fee-for-service, and widespread integration of smaller, single-specialty practices into larger health systems,” he said.

    Compensation Increases Flat Across Specialties

    The 2.8 percent overall weighted average increase in compensation across all specialties was also slightly lower than in recent years, Vaudrey said.

    “The 2.8 percent increase is just below what we typically see, which is around 3 percent, so compensation growth has slowed down a touch,” Vaudrey said. “The biggest drivers were the primary care specialties, which isn’t a surprise considering the focus of healthcare reform on the primary area.”

    Cardiac/thoracic surgeons remain the best-compensated specialty with a median compensation of $544,087, which was a 2.16 percent increase from the previous year. Following them are cath lab cardiologists with a median of $524,731, a 4.09 percent increase, and orthopedic surgeons with a median of $515,759, a 2.78 percent increase from the year before.

    Specialties that recorded the biggest increases in annual compensation were hematology and medical oncology (up 7.13 percent to a median $348,157), hypertension and nephrology (up 6.99 percent to a median $277,934), and urgent care (up 5.17 percent to a median $242,145).

    Endocrinologists experienced the biggest drop in compensation, from a median $233,000 to $221,400, a 4.98 percent decrease. In addition to radiology, other specialties experiencing decreases in compensation were rheumatologists (down 1.09 percent to a median $229,051) and otolaryngologists (down 0.81 percent to a median $374,384).


    Click to view larger table
     

    Diagnostic Radiologists Show Largest Drop in RVUs

    The overall weighted average relative value units (RVUs) decreased for all specialties by 0.5 percent in 2011. RVUs are a measure of physician output based on the value assigned to each Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code through the resource-based relative value scale used partially by Medicare and nearly all health maintenance organizations.

    Because reimbursement by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is based on the RVU system, overall revenue falls when RVUs decrease, according to experts. CMS rates per RVU may also be scaled downward or revised annually through the budget reconciliation process.

    The survey showed that RVU rates for primary care and medical specialties were fairly flat, with increases of 1.4 percent and 0.2 percent respectively. RVU rates for surgical specialties increased by 1.2 percent. Interventional radiology had the third highest work RVU increase at 2.84 percent, behind infectious disease (4.37 percent) and urgent care (3.88 percent). RVUs for diagnostic radiologists decreased by 10.52 percent, the largest drop of any specialty.

    “The growth of therapeutic procedures performed by interventional radiologists in oncology and gynecology may explain the increase in RVUs for interventional radiologists,” said David Yousem, M.D., M.B.A., a professor in the Department of Radiology, vice-chair of program development and director of neuroradiology at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, and a nationally recognized expert on radiology economics.

    Factors that may have contributed to the drop in RVUs for diagnostic radiologists include the declining number of CT procedures, due in part to public and industry-wide emphasis on radiation safety, and the impact of the poor economy leading to fewer elective procedures performed, Dr. Yousem said.

    “Confusion about mammography recommendations and the impact of the multiple procedure 50 percent reduction for image interpretation made by CMS in its reimbursement calculations in 2011 may also have led to the decrease in RVUs,” Dr. Yousem said. CMS decreased the multiple procedure payment reduction for interpretation of imaging from 50 to 25 percent in 2012.

    Radiology Compensation Likely to Remain Flat

    Vaudrey said that 2013 should show an overall increase in compensation of about 3 percent but he doesn’t expect to see a dramatic increase in compensation levels for radiologists any time soon.

    “I think we’ll continue to see flat numbers,” he said. “I don’t think there will be more negative numbers—we don’t usually see negative numbers two years in a row—but I do think any increase will be below average.”

    Web Extras

    More information about the American Medical Group Association is available at www.amga.org.

    black arrowhead 9 x 10 GIF Contact the editor 

    Vaudrey
    Vaudrey
    Fisher
    Fisher
    Yousem
    Yousem
  • comments powered by Disqus

We appreciate your comments and suggestions in our effort to improve your RSNA web experience.

Name (required)

 

Email Address (required)

 

Comments (required)

 

 

 

 

Discounted Dues: Eligible North American Countries 
Belize
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatamala
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Netherlands Antilles
Nicaragua
Panama
St.Lucia
St. Vincent & Grenadines
Country    Country    Country 
Afghanistan   Grenada   Pakistan
Albania   Guatemala   Papua New Guinea
Algeria   Guinea   Paraguay
Angola   Guinea-Bissau   Peru
Armenia   Guyana   Phillippines
Azerbaijan   Haiti   Rwanda
Bangladesh   Honduras   Samoa
Belarus   India   Sao Tome & Principe
Belize   Indonesia   Senegal
Benin   Iran   Serbia
Bhutan   Iraq   Sierra Leone
Bolivia   Jordan   Solomon Islands
Bosnia & Herzegovina   Jamaica   Somalia
Botswana   Kenya   South Africa
Bulgaria   Kiribati   South Sudan
Burkina Faso   Korea, Dem Rep (North)   Sri Lanka
Burundi   Kosovo   St Lucia
Cambodia   Kyrgyzstan   St Vincent & Grenadines
Cameroon   Laos\Lao PDR   Sudan
Cape Verde   Lesotho   Swaziland
Central African Republic   Liberia   Syria
Chad   Macedonia   Tajikistan
China   Madagascar   Tanzania
Colombia   Malawi   Thailand
Comoros   Maldives   Timor-Leste
Congo, Dem. Rep.   Mali   Togo
Congo, Republic of   Marshall Islands   Tonga
Cote d'Ivoire   Mauritania   Tunisia
Djibouti   Micronesia, Fed. Sts.   Turkmenistan
Dominica   Moldova   Tuvalu
Domicican Republic   Mongolia   Uganda
Ecuador   Montenegro   Ukraine
Egypt   Morocco   Uzbekistan
El Salvador   Mozambique   Vanuatu
Eritrea   Myanmar   Vietnam
Ethiopia   Namibia   West Bank & Gaza
Fiji   Nepal   Yemen
Gambia, The   Nicaragua   Zambia
Georgia   Niger   Zimbabwe
Ghana   Nigeria    

Legacy Collection 2
Radiology Logo
RadioGraphics Logo 
Tier 1

  • Bed count: 1-400
  • Associate College: Community, Technical, Further Education (UK), Tribal College
  • Community Public Library (small scale): general reference public library, museum, non-profit administration office

Tier 2

  • Bed count: 401-750
  • Baccalaureate College or University: Bachelor's is the highest degree offered
  • Master's College or University: Master's is the highest degree offered
  • Special Focus Institution: theological seminaries, Bible colleges, engineering, technological, business, management, art, music, design, law

Tier 3

  • Bedcount: 751-1,000
  • Research University: high or very high research activity without affiliated medical school
  • Health Profession School: non-medical, but health focused

Tier 4

  • Bed count: 1,001 +
  • Medical School: research universities with medical school, including medical centers

Tier 5

  • Consortia: academic, medical libraries, affiliated hospitals, regional libraries and other networks
  • Corporate
  • Government Agency and Ministry
  • Hospital System
  • Private Practice
  • Research Institute: government and non-government health research
  • State or National Public Library
  • Professional Society: trade unions, industry trade association, lobbying organization