• News App
  • To:
  • MR Imaging Plays Pivotal Role in Stem Cell Tracking

    December 01, 2013

    Intravenous iron can be used to safely and effectively label stem cell transplants for tracking with MR imaging in arthritic joints and other target tissues, new research shows.

    Intravenous iron can be used to safely and effectively label stem cell transplants for tracking with MR imaging in arthritic joints and other target tissues, according to a recent Radiology study.

    Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have great potential in tissue regeneration and cell-based therapy, according to Heike E. Daldrup-Link, M.D., Ph.D., co-author of the study that appeared in the October issue of Radiology. Once transplanted from donor into recipient, MSCs can help repair damaged joints by giving rise to connective tissue, bone and cartilage, but the stem cells should be tracked to confirm the procedure’s success, Dr. Daldrup-Link said.

    “The most common problem is that stem cells, when transplanted, die and disappear from the transplant site,” said Dr. Daldrup-Link, an associate professor in the Department of Radiology and a member of the Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford University School of Medicine. “Alternatively, they stay in the correct site but don’t differentiate into cartilage.”

    Current labeling methods involve removing stem cells from a donor and then placing the cells in a culture dish with an iron oxide solution. The iron oxide-labeled cells are then transplanted into the recipient patient. Such ex-vivo labeling requires handling of the stem cells between harvest and transplantation, introducing the possibility of contamination.

    “Orthopedic surgeons want labeled stem cells, but not the ones that are manipulated between the bone marrow harvest and transplantation,” Dr. Daldrup-Link said.

    The Stanford researchers theorized that they could more effectively label the stem cells through an in-vivo approach.

    “Our solution was to give an iron supplement to the stem cell donor intravenously before harvesting,” Dr. Daldrup-Link said. “The donor cells, including bone marrow stem cells, pick up the iron oxides, and these stem cells can then be tracked with MR imaging.”

    In-Vivo Approach Shows Promise

    Prior to testing in humans, researchers conducted an animal study, injecting rats with ferumoxytol, an FDA-approved iron supplement for treating patients with iron deficiency anemia, 48 hours prior to extraction of the stem cells from bone marrow. They then compared the ferumoxytol uptake by the stem cells with results from traditional ex-vivo-labeling procedures.

    “To our surprise, we found that the stem cells take up significantly more iron with the intravenous labeling procedure than they do if we label them ex vivo,” Dr. Daldrup-Link said.

    After transplanting the labeled stem cells into cartilage defects in the knees of seven rats, researchers performed MR imaging to track the cells for up to four weeks. Microscopic examination confirmed the presence of iron in the labeled transplants and showed evidence that repair was underway in the damaged joints.

    In-vivo labeling not only eliminates the risk of contamination from ex-vivo labeling procedures, but also provides more immediate feedback on the status of the cells.

    “The current approach to determine successful engraftment requires long-term follow up that imaging studies weeks or months after cell transplantion, even though the stem cells may die relatively soon after the procedure,” Dr. Daldrup-Link said. “With this method, we could show more quickly if cells disappear from the transplant site or if they proliferate too much after the transplant.”

    The Stanford researchers are completing more examinations and plan to study the technique in rabbits before patient trials begin. Since the intravenous iron solution is widely used on anemic patients, Dr. Daldrup-Link believes that patient trials are just around the corner.

    MR image of ferumoxytol labeled stem cells implanted in a rat cartilage defect model
    (Click to enlarge) Left: MR image of ferumoxytol labeled stem cells implanted in a rat cartilage defect model; right: the dark transplant shows the labeled cells (arrows show the location of the implanted cells).
    Images courtesy of Heike E. Daldrup-Link, M.D., Ph.D. 

    MR Imaging Holds Great Potential in Cell Tracking

    The findings point to the ultimate clinical role of MR imaging for cell tracking: monitoring the accuracy of cell injection in real time with MR-compatible catheters, according to Jeff W.M. Bulte, Ph.D., director of cellular imaging at Johns Hopkins University’s Institute for Cell Engineering in Baltimore, Md., and one of the world’s leading authorities on stem cell transplantation and tracking.

    Dr. Bulte, who authored a Radiology editorial accompanying the research, said that the ability to track MR-labeled MSCs safely and effectively will have myriad clinical applications well beyond the treatment of damaged joints.

    “These techniques are universal and could have many potentially useful applications, including heart repair and repair of brain neurons,” he said.

    Noninvasive monitoring of the movement and accumulation of stem cells would enable clinicians to determine whether cell delivery has occurred in the appropriate location and whether transplanted cells have reached the appropriate location for each patient.

    “We can’t take biopsies, so noninvasive imaging is the way to go in the future,” Dr. Bulte said. “It’s sort of like FedEx tracking your packages to make sure they reach their destination.”

    Dr. Bulte cautioned that there are several limitations to the iron-oxide labeling approach. Not all donors yield sufficient numbers of MSCs and efforts to get a sufficient number may dilute the ferumoxytol label to uncertain cellular detection levels. In addition, the approach cannot distinguish live cells from dead cells and has difficulty differentiating between labeled MSCs and macrophages—the immune cells that engulf cellular debris and pathogens.

    Labeling stem cells with fluorine represents a promising alternative that may overcome some of the limitations of the iron oxide method, Dr. Bulte said. Because fluorine resonates at a different frequency than hydrogen, the MR imaging coil can be tuned to its specific frequency. Since there is little to no fluorine in the body, the signal from the labeled fluorine can then be easily distinguished from any background noise and the quantity of the labeled cells can be determined with accuracy.

    The labeled fluorine approach was first tested on a patient in April at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute in Pittsburgh, and studies are ongoing.

    Web Extras

    Access the Radiology study, “Iron Administration Before Stem Cell Harvest Enables MR Imaging Tracking after Transplantation,” at pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.13130858.

    Heike E. Daldrup-Link, M.D., Ph.D.
    Jeff W.M. Bulte, Ph.D.
    Hossein Nejadnik, M.D., Ph.D., and Fanny Chapelin, M.D.
    Stanford researchers, including, above, Hossein Nejadnik, M.D., Ph.D., and Fanny Chapelin, M.D., demonstrated that intravenous iron can be used to safely and effectively label stem cell transplants for tracking with MR imaging in arthritic joints and other target tissues. Image courtesy of Heike E. Daldrup-Link, M.D., Ph.D.
    Confocal image of ferumoxytol-labeled cells
    (Click to enlarge): Confocal image of ferumoxytol-labeled cells (ferumoxytol had been conjugated with green fluorescent fluorescein isothiocyanate [FITC]).
  • comments powered by Disqus

We appreciate your comments and suggestions in our effort to improve your RSNA web experience.

Name (required)


Email Address (required)


Comments (required)





Discounted Dues: Eligible North American Countries 
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Netherlands Antilles
St. Vincent & Grenadines
Country    Country    Country 
Afghanistan   Grenada   Pakistan
Albania   Guatemala   Papua New Guinea
Algeria   Guinea   Paraguay
Angola   Guinea-Bissau   Peru
Armenia   Guyana   Phillippines
Azerbaijan   Haiti   Rwanda
Bangladesh   Honduras   Samoa
Belarus   India   Sao Tome & Principe
Belize   Indonesia   Senegal
Benin   Iran   Serbia
Bhutan   Iraq   Sierra Leone
Bolivia   Jordan   Solomon Islands
Bosnia & Herzegovina   Jamaica   Somalia
Botswana   Kenya   South Africa
Bulgaria   Kiribati   South Sudan
Burkina Faso   Korea, Dem Rep (North)   Sri Lanka
Burundi   Kosovo   St Lucia
Cambodia   Kyrgyzstan   St Vincent & Grenadines
Cameroon   Laos\Lao PDR   Sudan
Cape Verde   Lesotho   Swaziland
Central African Republic   Liberia   Syria
Chad   Macedonia   Tajikistan
China   Madagascar   Tanzania
Colombia   Malawi   Thailand
Comoros   Maldives   Timor-Leste
Congo, Dem. Rep.   Mali   Togo
Congo, Republic of   Marshall Islands   Tonga
Cote d'Ivoire   Mauritania   Tunisia
Djibouti   Micronesia, Fed. Sts.   Turkmenistan
Dominica   Moldova   Tuvalu
Domicican Republic   Mongolia   Uganda
Ecuador   Montenegro   Ukraine
Egypt   Morocco   Uzbekistan
El Salvador   Mozambique   Vanuatu
Eritrea   Myanmar   Vietnam
Ethiopia   Namibia   West Bank & Gaza
Fiji   Nepal   Yemen
Gambia, The   Nicaragua   Zambia
Georgia   Niger   Zimbabwe
Ghana   Nigeria    

Legacy Collection 2
Radiology Logo
RadioGraphics Logo 
Tier 1

  • Bed count: 1-400
  • Associate College: Community, Technical, Further Education (UK), Tribal College
  • Community Public Library (small scale): general reference public library, museum, non-profit administration office

Tier 2

  • Bed count: 401-750
  • Baccalaureate College or University: Bachelor's is the highest degree offered
  • Master's College or University: Master's is the highest degree offered
  • Special Focus Institution: theological seminaries, Bible colleges, engineering, technological, business, management, art, music, design, law

Tier 3

  • Bedcount: 751-1,000
  • Research University: high or very high research activity without affiliated medical school
  • Health Profession School: non-medical, but health focused

Tier 4

  • Bed count: 1,001 +
  • Medical School: research universities with medical school, including medical centers

Tier 5

  • Consortia: academic, medical libraries, affiliated hospitals, regional libraries and other networks
  • Corporate
  • Government Agency and Ministry
  • Hospital System
  • Private Practice
  • Research Institute: government and non-government health research
  • State or National Public Library
  • Professional Society: trade unions, industry trade association, lobbying organization