21/xsl/MobileMenu.xsltmobileNave880e1541/WorkArea//http://www.rsna.org/TwoColumnWireframe.aspx?pageid=2794&id=10328&ekfxmen_noscript=1&ekfxmensel=falsefalsetruetruetruefalsefalse10-18.0.0.0730truefalse
  •  
     
  • News App
  • To:
    From:
    Subject:
    Comment:
    Link:
      
  • Ontario Switches to DR Mammography Based on Radiology Study

    October 01, 2013

    Mammography using digital direct radiology (DR) is more effective at detecting breast cancer than mammography using computed radiography, research shows.

    A study recently published in Radiology showing that mammography using digital direct radiography (DR) is more effective at detecting breast cancer than mammography using computed radiography (CR) had an immediate impact on healthcare in the province of Ontario, where the research was conducted.

    On May 14, the day after the Radiology study was published online, Deb Matthews, minister of health and long-term care for Ontario, announced that based on the results of the study, the province would be phasing out CR mammography devices and replacing them with DR mammography devices over the coming months. The Radiology study was based on data from the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP).

    Researchers are understandably excited about the outcome of their study. “In the OBSP, we strive for excellence and we want to provide women coming to this program with the best technology possible,” said the study’s lead author, Anna M. Chiarelli, Ph.D., senior scientist in Prevention and Cancer Control at Cancer Care Ontario in Toronto. “Until this study was conducted, there was really no clinical evidence suggesting there was this difference. We’re very confident in our data, so the government decided to take these measures in Ontario.”

    In the study, Dr. Chiarelli and colleagues identified three groups of women 50 to 74 years of age who were screened in the OBSP between
    January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009. Slightly more than 400,000 women were screened with screen-film mammography, 220,520 were screened with DR and about 64,210 with CR mammography. All were followed for 12 months after screening.

    DR mammography was able to detect 4.9 cancers per 1,000 mammograms (comparable to screen film mammography’s 4.8 cancers per 1,000 mammograms) compared to just 3.4 cancers per 1,000 mammograms detected by CR mammography.

    The difference lies with the technical process that computed radiography uses to acquire an image, according to researchers. CR uses a cassette that houses the imaging plate that records the image. That cassette is then placed in a reader to create a digital image. DR technology, on the other hand, produces an image directly.

    “With CR mammography, information is lost in processing,” said Derek Muradali, M.D., co-author of the study and head of the Division of Breast Imaging at the University of Toronto. “The images tend to lower resolution compared to DR mammography.” he said.

    Despite Ontario’s decision to replace CR mammography with DR mammography, Drs. Chiarelli and Muradali said that women who underwent CR mammography still have a very small chance of having developed an undetected cancer.

    “The 21 percent difference in the cancer detection rate would amount to about 10 fewer cancers detected for every 10,000 women screened,” Dr. Chiarelli said. “We feel that’s probably a pretty small number, as long as women continue to get their regular screening with the newer technology.” q

    Breast Screening Featured at RSNA 2013

    The Refresher Course, “Current Issues in Breast Cancer Screening,” will be held from 2 to 3:30 p.m., Sunday, Dec. 1, at RSNA 2013. Registration for this and other sessions is underway at RSNA.org/Annual_Meeting.aspx.

    Web Extras

    Access the Radiology study, “Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Performance Measures in Concurrent Cohorts within an Organized Breast Screening Program,” at Radiology.rsna.org/content/early/2013/04/29/radiol.13122567.

    Breast Cancer Screening Focus of Radiology Select, Volume 4

    The newest volume of Radiology Select, Volume 4: Breast Cancer Screening, is now available to RSNA members and non-members for purchase.

    The fourth in the continuing series of selected Radiology articles focusing on a specific subspecialty topic, Radiology Select, Volume 4, features 34 articles that cover:

    • Screening performance criteria, benchmarks, variability and outcomes
    • The effect of CAD on mammographic screening
    • Results and challenges in high-risk populations
    • Comparison findings for digital mammography

    The edition is available in print, online and tablet formats.

    The online self-assessment module (SAM) edition includes five SAM tests with an opportunity to earn 15 SAM credits and 15 CME credits. This material can be applied towards the American Board of Radiology (ABR) self-assessment requirement.
    To purchase and for information on Radiology Select, visit RSNA.org/RadiologySelect.

    Click to view a video introduction by Radiology Select Editor Deborah Levine, M.D.

    Anna M. Chiarelli, Ph.D.
    Chiarelli
    Derek Muradali, M.D.
    Muradali
    Digital direct radiology
    Digital direct radiology, (shown above), is more effective at detecting breast cancer than computed radiography, according to recent Radiology research. Image courtesy of Getty Images
  • comments powered by Disqus

We appreciate your comments and suggestions in our effort to improve your RSNA web experience.

Name (required)

 

Email Address (required)

 

Comments (required)

 

 

 

 

Discounted Dues: Eligible North American Countries 
Belize
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatamala
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Netherlands Antilles
Nicaragua
Panama
St.Lucia
St. Vincent & Grenadines
Country    Country    Country 
Afghanistan   Grenada   Pakistan
Albania   Guatemala   Papua New Guinea
Algeria   Guinea   Paraguay
Angola   Guinea-Bissau   Peru
Armenia   Guyana   Phillippines
Azerbaijan   Haiti   Rwanda
Bangladesh   Honduras   Samoa
Belarus   India   Sao Tome & Principe
Belize   Indonesia   Senegal
Benin   Iran   Serbia
Bhutan   Iraq   Sierra Leone
Bolivia   Jordan   Solomon Islands
Bosnia & Herzegovina   Jamaica   Somalia
Botswana   Kenya   South Africa
Bulgaria   Kiribati   South Sudan
Burkina Faso   Korea, Dem Rep (North)   Sri Lanka
Burundi   Kosovo   St Lucia
Cambodia   Kyrgyzstan   St Vincent & Grenadines
Cameroon   Laos\Lao PDR   Sudan
Cape Verde   Lesotho   Swaziland
Central African Republic   Liberia   Syria
Chad   Macedonia   Tajikistan
China   Madagascar   Tanzania
Colombia   Malawi   Thailand
Comoros   Maldives   Timor-Leste
Congo, Dem. Rep.   Mali   Togo
Congo, Republic of   Marshall Islands   Tonga
Cote d'Ivoire   Mauritania   Tunisia
Djibouti   Micronesia, Fed. Sts.   Turkmenistan
Dominica   Moldova   Tuvalu
Domicican Republic   Mongolia   Uganda
Ecuador   Montenegro   Ukraine
Egypt   Morocco   Uzbekistan
El Salvador   Mozambique   Vanuatu
Eritrea   Myanmar   Vietnam
Ethiopia   Namibia   West Bank & Gaza
Fiji   Nepal   Yemen
Gambia, The   Nicaragua   Zambia
Georgia   Niger   Zimbabwe
Ghana   Nigeria    

Legacy Collection 2
Radiology Logo
RadioGraphics Logo 
Tier 1

  • Bed count: 1-400
  • Associate College: Community, Technical, Further Education (UK), Tribal College
  • Community Public Library (small scale): general reference public library, museum, non-profit administration office

Tier 2

  • Bed count: 401-750
  • Baccalaureate College or University: Bachelor's is the highest degree offered
  • Master's College or University: Master's is the highest degree offered
  • Special Focus Institution: theological seminaries, Bible colleges, engineering, technological, business, management, art, music, design, law

Tier 3

  • Bedcount: 751-1,000
  • Research University: high or very high research activity without affiliated medical school
  • Health Profession School: non-medical, but health focused

Tier 4

  • Bed count: 1,001 +
  • Medical School: research universities with medical school, including medical centers

Tier 5

  • Consortia: academic, medical libraries, affiliated hospitals, regional libraries and other networks
  • Corporate
  • Government Agency and Ministry
  • Hospital System
  • Private Practice
  • Research Institute: government and non-government health research
  • State or National Public Library
  • Professional Society: trade unions, industry trade association, lobbying organization