• Radiology Reporting Initiative

  • What is the radiology reporting initiative?

    The clinical report is an essential part of the service you provide to your patients. As a tool that communicates information to referring physicians, records that information for future use and serves as the legal record that documents the episode of care, it is of the utmost importance that the report be uniform, comprehensive, easily managed and "readable" to humans and machines alike.

    The RSNA radiology reporting initiative is improving reporting practices by creating a library of clear and consistent report templates. These templates make it possible to integrate all of the evidence collected during the imaging procedure, including clinical data, coded terminology, technical parameters, measurements, annotations and key images. Twelve subcommittees of subspecialty experts have created a library of best-practices radiology report templates. They are free and not subject to license restrictions on their reuse. These report templates:

    • Create uniformity and improve your communication with referring providers
    • Enable your practice to meet accreditation criteria
    • Help your practice earn pay-for-performance incentives

    Through this initiative, RSNA is encouraging reporting vendors to develop software products that enable radiologists to create high-quality radiology reports more efficiently.

    How is it used?

    The report template library serves as a starting point for radiology practices wishing to improve the quality of their reports by standardizing format, content and structure. These new report templates represent best-practices that can be adapted and adopted based on your local practice patterns. The templates are published in a form that is accessible to you—whether you use automated speech recognition or other reporting tools.

    In addition to the clinical benefits, these templates have advantages for research and education. For researchers, these report templates capture information in a uniform, easily extracted format that facilitates clinical, translational and health services research. Educators find these templates can help trainees learn the important elements of reports in each subspecialty area and encourage the proper use of radiology terms, such as those found in RadLex™

    Who is involved?

    Beginning in 2009, twelve RSNA template development subcommittees—comprising over 100 experts—created 68 radiology report templates in collaboration with fourteen subspecialty organizations. A radiology vendor forum attracted a dozen companies who demonstrated their radiology reporting software and learned how they can incorporate the new templates into their systems. These vendors will continue to be engaged through the RSNA IHE platform. There are now more than 100 templates available in the RSNA template library.

    How do I adopt this solution?

    1. You or your IT administrator can obtain the templates from the Template Library, in human-readable text and structured data formats that will be familiar to vendor representatives and your technical staff. The text templates can serve as a starting point to develop a consensus among the radiologists in your practice. Once your practice has agreed upon a set of consensus templates, they can be incorporated into your reporting system by your IT administrator or your reporting vendor.
    2.  Participate in the template development process. Each template development subcommittee uses a news group to coordinate its activities. Anyone can request to join one of these groups. The subcommittee chairs also welcome suggestions for needed templates. Comments can be submitted to reporting@rsna.org 

    Related Publications

    The following publications have been authored by the committee and its members:

    • Dunnick NR, Langlotz CP: The radiology report of the future: A summary of the 2007 Intersociety Conference. Journal of the American College of Radiology 5(5): 626-9, May 2008
    • Weiss DL and Langlotz CP: Structured reporting: Patient care enhancement or productivity nightmare? Radiology 249: 739-47, Dec 2008.
    • Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Cummings JE, Dent JM, Hodgson JM, Hoffmann U, Horn RJ 3rd, Hundley WG, Kahn CE Jr, Martin GR, Masoudi FA, Peterson ED, Rosenthal GL, Solomon H, Stillman AE, Teague SD, Thomas JD, Tilkemeier PL, Guy Weigold W: American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF). ACCF/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/NASCI/RSNA/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 Health Policy Statement on Structured Reporting in Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53(1):76-90.
    • Kahn CE, Langlotz CP, Burnside ES, Carrino JA, Channin DS, Hovsepian DM, Rubin DL: Towards best practices in radiology reporting. Radiology. September 2009. 252:852-856
    • Langlotz CP: Structured radiology reporting: Are we there yet? Radiology. October 2009 253(1):23-25
    • Burnside ES: The ACR BI-RADS® experience: Learning from history. JACR 2009. (In press.)
    • Langlotz CP: The ACR BI-RADS® system for breast imaging communication: A roadmap for the rest of radiology. JACR 2009. (In press.)
  • Resources

  • RsnaProgram7

    Reporting Wiki

    Find updates on the committee activity, reporting templates, technical resources and link to the discussion forum.


    Template Library

    Access free reporting templates to create uniformity and efficiency within the clinical reporting process.

We appreciate your comments and suggestions in our effort to improve your RSNA web experience.

Name (required)


Email Address (required)


Comments (required)





Discounted Dues: Eligible North American Countries 
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Netherlands Antilles
St. Vincent & Grenadines
Country    Country    Country 
Afghanistan   Grenada   Pakistan
Albania   Guatemala   Papua New Guinea
Algeria   Guinea   Paraguay
Angola   Guinea-Bissau   Peru
Armenia   Guyana   Phillippines
Azerbaijan   Haiti   Rwanda
Bangladesh   Honduras   Samoa
Belarus   India   Sao Tome & Principe
Belize   Indonesia   Senegal
Benin   Iran   Serbia
Bhutan   Iraq   Sierra Leone
Bolivia   Jordan   Solomon Islands
Bosnia & Herzegovina   Jamaica   Somalia
Botswana   Kenya   South Africa
Bulgaria   Kiribati   South Sudan
Burkina Faso   Korea, Dem Rep (North)   Sri Lanka
Burundi   Kosovo   St Lucia
Cambodia   Kyrgyzstan   St Vincent & Grenadines
Cameroon   Laos\Lao PDR   Sudan
Cape Verde   Lesotho   Swaziland
Central African Republic   Liberia   Syria
Chad   Macedonia   Tajikistan
China   Madagascar   Tanzania
Colombia   Malawi   Thailand
Comoros   Maldives   Timor-Leste
Congo, Dem. Rep.   Mali   Togo
Congo, Republic of   Marshall Islands   Tonga
Cote d'Ivoire   Mauritania   Tunisia
Djibouti   Micronesia, Fed. Sts.   Turkmenistan
Dominica   Moldova   Tuvalu
Domicican Republic   Mongolia   Uganda
Ecuador   Montenegro   Ukraine
Egypt   Morocco   Uzbekistan
El Salvador   Mozambique   Vanuatu
Eritrea   Myanmar   Vietnam
Ethiopia   Namibia   West Bank & Gaza
Fiji   Nepal   Yemen
Gambia, The   Nicaragua   Zambia
Georgia   Niger   Zimbabwe
Ghana   Nigeria    

Legacy Collection 2
Radiology Logo
RadioGraphics Logo 
Tier 1

  • Bed count: 1-400
  • Associate College: Community, Technical, Further Education (UK), Tribal College
  • Community Public Library (small scale): general reference public library, museum, non-profit administration office

Tier 2

  • Bed count: 401-750
  • Baccalaureate College or University: Bachelor's is the highest degree offered
  • Master's College or University: Master's is the highest degree offered
  • Special Focus Institution: theological seminaries, Bible colleges, engineering, technological, business, management, art, music, design, law

Tier 3

  • Bedcount: 751-1,000
  • Research University: high or very high research activity without affiliated medical school
  • Health Profession School: non-medical, but health focused

Tier 4

  • Bed count: 1,001 +
  • Medical School: research universities with medical school, including medical centers

Tier 5

  • Consortia: academic, medical libraries, affiliated hospitals, regional libraries and other networks
  • Corporate
  • Government Agency and Ministry
  • Hospital System
  • Private Practice
  • Research Institute: government and non-government health research
  • State or National Public Library
  • Professional Society: trade unions, industry trade association, lobbying organization