RSNA News - September 2004
Medical-Legal Jury Trial at RSNA 2004
Sympathy is hardly ever the deciding factor in a malpractice case.
They're won on the medicine. The odds are actually stacked in favor
of the physician."
Keith A. Hebeisen, J.D.
The idea of weathering a malpractice trial is something that makes
any medical professional jittery. But at this year's RSNA Scientific
Assembly and Annual Meeting, members will have a chance to get a glimpse
inside a medical-legal jury trial, learn about the proceedings and
form their own opinionswithout spending a dime on legal advice. It's
part of a special session to be held on Sunday, November 28 from 10:30
a.m. to 3:30 p.m. in room S100AB in the South Building at McCormick
Place.
The mock trial involves the case of a lung lesion missed in a previous
chest examination. The unscripted trial will include two attorneys,
expert witnesses and a Chicago-area judge who regularly presides in
medical malpractice litigation. Leonard Berlin, M.D., chairman of
the Department of Radiology at Rush North Shore Medical Center in
Skokie, Ill., is coordinating the session.
"It's a malpractice case concerning a 60-year-old man who presented
with a cough. The chest x-ray was read as normal by the radiologist.
The symptoms get a little better, then they get a little worse,"
explains Dr. Berlin. "Ten months later, another chest x-ray shows
a lung tumor. Sure enough, it's cancer and a year later the patient
dies, leaving a wife and four kids."
Dr. Berlin says he picked this particular scenario because of the
sympathy elicited by the patient involved, a man with a family, and
also because the facts in the case leave plenty of gray areas. "The
x-ray shows a subtle shading. It's not going to be a blatant case.
A reasonable person could see both sides," says Dr. Berlin.
Who are those "reasonable people?" The RSNA meeting staff
is sending out questionnaires to RSNA 2004 contractors working at
McCormick Place. Florists, booth decorators, audio-visual crews and
phone company workers will be asked whether they'd like to spend part
of their day participating as potential jurors. They will have no
familiarity with the case being presented and will go through a "jury
selection" process that will be similar to, albeit quicker than,
that of a typical malpractice case.
In addition to assembling a jury similar to one that might actually
hear the facts in the suit, session attendees will also benefit from
the experience of two seasoned medical malpractice attorneys. Timothy
B. Nickels, J.D., of the nationally recognized Chicago law firm Swanson,
Bell and Martin will act as the counsel for the defense. Nickels has
represented some of the largest corporations and prestigious institutions
in cases pending in Illinois, Indiana, and other jurisdictions throughout
the United States. Keith A. Hebeisen, J.D., a partner in Chicago's
Clifford Law Firm, will act as plaintiff's attorney. Hebeisen specializes
in complex and highly technical areas of medical malpractice, winning
multi-million dollar awards for his clients.
Dr. Berlin says the veteran attorneys will have approximately two
hours in the morning to make their cases before Cook County Circuit
Judge Stuart Nudelman, who has served as president of the Illinois
Judges Association. The Chicago Bar Association calls Judge Nudelman
"well-respected for his legal skill and ability," and says
he is "praised for his innovative ideas."
It will take a little innovation, inspiration and improvisation to
bring all the facts in the case to the jury and audience in just a
few hours. Both sides are scheduled to present their evidence and
witnesses before lunch. Judge Nudelman will instruct the jury, the
group will break, and then come back after lunch to deliver its verdict.
"We'll ask the jury why they came to their conclusion, they can
explain how they as lay people view everything. We'll have the two
attorneys talk about their strategies and the judge will address the
audience to talk about his role and answer questions," says Dr.
Berlin.
Hebeisen, acting as attorney for the plaintiff, says he hopes to change
what he feels are preconceived notions many physicians may have when
it comes to malpractice litigation. "Just because there's sympathy
for the patient, doctors feel they're on the short end of the stick.
That notion is the exact opposite of reality," he says. "Sympathy
is hardly ever the deciding factor in a malpractice case. They're
won on the medicine. The odds are actually stacked in favor of the
physician."
Hebeisen says only about 35 percent of cases that go to trial are
won by the plaintiffs. He says many cases that are clear-cut malpractice
situations are settled out of court. "The reality is that people
put doctors on a pedestal. They have respect for them. They believe
doctors are under siege and they don't want to hurt them. Juries are
very skeptical of medical malpractice cases, and they are getting
more skeptical as time goes by," he says.
When it's time to select a jury at RSNA 2004, Hebeisen say there will
be no such thing as an ideal juror, "You're just able to get
rid of the bad ones if you're lucky." He'll be looking for people
to serve who have open minds, no prejudice against someone who would
file a malpractice suit, and jurors who would have no preconceived
notion about awards that could be given to a plaintiff.
Dr. Berlin hopes the mock trial helps radiologists gain a greater
understanding of the malpractice litigation process. And he thinks
the session at the RSNA annual meeting creates a unique opportunity.
"The bottom line is to educate radiologists and to improve patient
care and minimize malpractice exposure. They go hand in hand,"
he concludes.
To register for this session at RSNA 2004, go to www.rsna.org. Click
on the annual meeting logo, and then on Registration, Housing and
Courses in the left-hand navigation bar.
 |
Posteroanterior chest radiograph obtained when a 60-year-old patient presented with a cough. The radiograph was read as normal by the radiologist. The lawsuit claims the
radiologist was negligent for missing a lung carcinoma.
Image courtesy of Leonard Berlin, M.D. |
|