• Wilfred C. G. Peh, MD, FRCP, FRCR: 1998 Eyler Editorial Fellow

  • Like Donald Frush, my co-Editorial Fellow, I was treading in untested waters when I applied for the inaugural RSNA Editorial Fellowship. This was then a new creation with no clear guidelines, and its full scope was unknown. The fellowship has since evolved, with our input and the contributions of subsequent fellows.

    The RSNA Editorial Fellowship was established at a most opportune time for me. I had been in academic Radiology for about 6 years, had a decent number of publications under my belt, was actively involved in research projects, and had quite a lot of experience presenting at most if not all of the major international and regional meetings. I had just been appointed founding Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of the Hong Kong College of Radiologists (JHKCR). The first issue had been published and the second issue was in press when I began my fellowship.

    Starting up a new journal was very hard work and a most unique and challenging experience that not many radiologists have the opportunity to receive. Although I had been reviewing manuscripts and sat on the editorial boards of a few journals, actually running a journal is a completely different kettle of fish. Talking to the chief editors and visiting the editorial offices of the few established nonradiologic medical journals in Hong Kong and Singapore helped me a lot. However, nothing beat having the uninterrupted and undisturbed period of being immersed in the daily operations of two major radiologic journals, Radiology and RadioGraphics, and spending time at the RSNA Publications Department at Oak Brook, Ill, during the 3 weeks prior to the RSNA Annual Meeting and Scientific Assembly.

    Both Radiology and RadioGraphics have differing roles and missions. Their editors, A. V. Proto and W. W. Olmsted, also have markedly different personal styles. Having spent time with both of them at close quarters, I realized that what they did have in common was their total commitment to their respective journals and their deep sense of mission and responsibility to the readers, authors, and our specialty as a whole. I realised that just being a top researcher or prolific writer is not enough for journal editorship; one needs vision and, definitely, passion. Selecting a suitable editor for a journal is therefore not an easy task.

    Besides reviewing and editing manuscripts, I was also interested in all aspects of manuscript processing and the publication process, as I was keen to adopt some of these processes to improve the JHKCR. I gained a lot of insight through lively discussions not only with the journal editors but also with publications staff in charge of areas such as the management, operations, manuscript tracking, manuscript editing, illustrations, production, and advertising. Although I left Hong Kong to return home to Singapore in 2000, JHKCR benefited greatly from the changes that I implemented after the RSNA Editorial Fellowship, and the knowledge gained will help improve journals that I am currently editing, namely, SGH Proceedings (of which I am Editor) and the Singapore Medical Journal (of which I am Deputy Editor).

    Besides the points I have mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, what I have gained is an insight about the workings of two top-notch journals. I have been able to correct misconceptions voiced by many of my colleagues and acquaintances regarding the RSNA publications, acting as an informal roving ambassador of sorts. My fellowship has inspired me to form a regional association of academic radiologists, and we conducted the First Regional Workshop on Medical Writing for Radiologists, in Singapore in January 2002. To my pleasant surprise, we discovered a wide interest in learning, as well as a need to learn, to write effectively among radiologists in the South and Southeast Asian region, and we will be organizing our second regional workshop, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, in October 2002. The third workshop is planned for April 2003 in Sri Lanka.

    Who will benefit from this fellowship? It is definitely not for a novice or someone who wants to learn how to write or review. The candidate should have a proven track record of publishing in peer-reviewed journals and have experience in manuscript reviewing. Such a candidate would normally be considered an expert or at least a rising star in his or her chosen subspecialty and should have presented, preferably in both oral and exhibit formats, at international scientific meetings. Ideally, the candidate will be able to contribute during the fellowship period and continue to develop his or her abilities following the fellowship. It is hoped this fellowship will act to identify and nurture future leaders in academic Radiology, who will be able to better serve our community, at home and internationally.
     

    Wilfred C. G. Peh, MD, FRCP, FRCR Clinical Professor and Academic Head Department of Diagnostic Radiology Singapore General Hospital

We appreciate your comments and suggestions in our effort to improve your RSNA web experience.

Name (required)

 

Email Address (required)

 

Comments (required)

 

 

 

 

Discounted Dues: Eligible North American Countries 
Belize
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatamala
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Netherlands Antilles
Nicaragua
Panama
St.Lucia
St. Vincent & Grenadines
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Botswana
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo, Dem. Rep.
Congo, Republic of
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Dominica
Domicican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Fiji
Gambia, The
Georgia
Ghana
Grenada
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Jordan
Jamaica
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kosovo*
Kyrgyzstan
Lao PDR
Laos

 

Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Maldives
Mali
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
Moldova
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands Antilles
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Pakistan
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Phillippines
Rwanda
Samoa
Sao Tome & Principe
Senegal
Somalia
South Africa
Sri Lanka
St Lucia
St Vincent & Grenadines
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Syria
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Tunisia
Turkmenistan
Uganda
Ukraine
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vietnam
West Bank & Gaza
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe

 

Tier 1

  • Bed count: 1-400
  • Associate College: Community, Technical, Further Education (UK), Tribal College
  • Community Public Library (small scale): general reference public library, museum, non-profit administration office

Tier 2

  • Bed count: 401-750
  • Baccalaureate College or University: Bachelor's is the highest degree offered
  • Master's College or University: Master's is the highest degree offered
  • Special Focus Institution: theological seminaries, Bible colleges, engineering, technological, business, management, art, music, design, law

Tier 3

  • Bedcount: 751-1 000
  • Research University: high or very high research activity without affiliated medical school
  • Health Profession School: non-medical, but health focused

Tier 4

  • Bed count: 1,001 +
  • Medical School: research universities with medical school, including medical centers

Tier 5

  • Consortia: academic, medical libraries, affiliated hospitals, regional libraries and other networks
  • Corporate
  • Government Agency and Ministry
  • Hospital System
  • Private Practice
  • Research Institute: government and non-government health research
  • State or National Public Library
  • Professional Society: trade unions, industry trade association, lobbying organization