• MIRC CTP Moves Files with the Most Powerful Anonymizer in the Industry

  • RSNA News continues its series of profiles on real-world Medical Imaging Resource Center (MIRC®) users with Daniel Rubin, M.D., M.S., a clinical assistant professor of radiology at Stanford University Medical Center, research scientist at Stanford Informatics and director of scientific development at the National Center for Biomedical Ontology. Dr. Rubin and his colleagues have been using the clinical trials processor (CTP) tool, based on MIRC technology, for about seven months in a study characterizing liver lesions.

    RSNA News, October 2008 

    "We needed to customize the system to anonymize particular fields and name the cases in a particular way according to the requirements of the research study," said Dr. Rubin. "CTP is open-source and scalable and offered the flexibility and features we need."

    The researchers have set up and successfully tested CTP's image sharing capabilities as they plan for a joint project to share images with other institutions, said Dr. Rubin. "When other institutions are involved, the de-identification is absolutely critical," he said. "There are multiple steps in the pipeline—you need the DICOM receiver, you need the image anonymizer and then you need a DICOM sender. CTP lets institution A configure it to receive an image from the PACS, then anonymize it and ship it off to institution B. At institution B, CTP receives images and then stores them in a local image archive."

    Especially useful is CTP's ability to customize anonymization based on any field within the DICOM image, as well as its ability to filter DICOM images using a flexible scripting language, Dr. Rubin said. "Some files that are secondary captures might have personal health information (PHI) burned into the image," he said. "With CTP, you can avoid the potential glitch of most anonymizers, which take a secondary capture image and anonymize the DICOM headers but haven't anonymized PHI contained within the image itself. We can enter some rules to recognize secondary capture images and not send them at all. In that regard, CTP has proven very powerful and flexible for image transmission."

    CTP also gives the researchers options for manipulating images, said Dr. Rubin. "They're not locked in to a single pre-specified workflow that any particular vendor provides," he said. "In addition, CTP provides a Web-based way of browsing the images you receive, like a mini-PACS, and you can download them using a Web browser and then delete the images off the server when you're done with them."

    For details about CTP installation and different customization options, Dr. Rubin urges potential users to consult the CTP wiki at MIRCwiki.RSNA.org. "It's very straightforward for anyone who has any kind of technical background," he said. "You're going to need to work with someone who knows to install the application on a server, but it's no more difficult to set up and install than MIRC."
     

    Daniel Rubin, M.D., M.S.

We appreciate your comments and suggestions in our effort to improve your RSNA web experience.

Name (required)

 

Email Address (required)

 

Comments (required)

 

 

 

 

Discounted Dues: Eligible North American Countries 
Belize
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatamala
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Netherlands Antilles
Nicaragua
Panama
St.Lucia
St. Vincent & Grenadines
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Botswana
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo, Dem. Rep.
Congo, Republic of
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Dominica
Domicican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Fiji
Gambia, The
Georgia
Ghana
Grenada
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Jordan
Jamaica
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kosovo*
Kyrgyzstan
Lao PDR
Laos

 

Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Maldives
Mali
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Mauritius
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
Moldova
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands Antilles
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Pakistan
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Phillippines
Rwanda
Samoa
Sao Tome & Principe
Senegal
Somalia
South Africa
Sri Lanka
St Lucia
St Vincent & Grenadines
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Syria
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Tunisia
Turkmenistan
Uganda
Ukraine
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vietnam
West Bank & Gaza
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe

 

Tier 1

  • Bed count: 1-400
  • Associate College: Community, Technical, Further Education (UK), Tribal College
  • Community Public Library (small scale): general reference public library, museum, non-profit administration office

Tier 2

  • Bed count: 401-750
  • Baccalaureate College or University: Bachelor's is the highest degree offered
  • Master's College or University: Master's is the highest degree offered
  • Special Focus Institution: theological seminaries, Bible colleges, engineering, technological, business, management, art, music, design, law

Tier 3

  • Bedcount: 751-1 000
  • Research University: high or very high research activity without affiliated medical school
  • Health Profession School: non-medical, but health focused

Tier 4

  • Bed count: 1,001 +
  • Medical School: research universities with medical school, including medical centers

Tier 5

  • Consortia: academic, medical libraries, affiliated hospitals, regional libraries and other networks
  • Corporate
  • Government Agency and Ministry
  • Hospital System
  • Private Practice
  • Research Institute: government and non-government health research
  • State or National Public Library
  • Professional Society: trade unions, industry trade association, lobbying organization